January 6, 2013

“Unwillingness; Unbelief; Unrighteousness!” cji 1/7/13 (essay)

 
“Unwillingness; Unbelief; Unrighteousness!” cji 1/7/13
 
“If We Reject the Lord –
He’ll Reject Us!”
(Isaiah 65)
 
 
What causes the Lord to withhold blessings from each of His children?  If the Lord be just and fair – exercising both mercy and justice – the same yesterday, today and forever why would he withhold anything from His children?  Throughout history it has been the pattern of men and women to blame the Lord for all of their misfortunes.  Denying anything on their parts which have caused the destruction, death, fear, and sorrow of which they partake.  The general question is always the same, ‘Why did God let this happen?’ ‘Were Heavenly Father a loving God he would’ve prevented all of the ugly of this life – why hasn’t he?’
 
Thus men/women blame God – not themselves – not the adversary – only they find value in blaming God! Why would anyone find value in blaming God for the actions of those who choose to do evil; for those who murder; for those who violate laws the nature; for those who indeed act as beasts? The answer is quite simple for it allows them to rebel against God – deny or find loopholes in the Commandments, Laws and Statutes of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  To blame God allows them to deny the truthfulness of the Bible and all Scriptures.
To blame God allows men/women to become unbelievers, disassociated, evolutionists, in short to fully associate with the world and worldly. 
 
With having excuses validated by the worldly then there is no reason for anyone individual to read, study and ponder the Scriptures. There is no value in a dead book – one which have been translated so many times – revised so many times and in fact used to exercise dominion and power over any who profess to believe or be saved.  Even their ministers, preachers, priests, rabbi’s, evangelists, nuns, sisters, and clergy of any sort don’t believe in the Bible totally and literally!  The mixture of philosophy and some scripture makes for a good sermon – and the rhetorical mixture of truth, dreams, fiction and outright denial makes for good entertainment. And then of course if it was good enough for their parents it’s good enough for them. 
 
What indeed has occurred is that while many profess to believe in the Gospel of Jesus Christ in reality is only a small fraction of what this Gospel contains.  By not reading, studying and pondering the Scriptures on their own – they are missing the substance of the Gospel.  By allowing another to read and tell them what is being taught – in a mixture of rhetorical interpretation is to be found without truth. How can anyone with such teachings and without having done their own homework ask a question of merit?  For when one asks a question with merit – those being asked will turn on them! When asking a question without merit and milk and toast answer will appease.  Yet it is the merit questions which one asks knowing what they’ve heard to date is wrong and what’s been given as an answer does not make common sense.
 
The situation then spirals rapidly away from the truthfulness of doctrine so that when real truth is being taught it is rejection of the hearer.  Truth will always make common sense – it’ll feel good and yet be rejected as it is found unfamiliar to those who’ve not read, studied and pondered. With this rejection – comes anger at why it makes sense – and therefore the instinct to believe has to be subdued. This is like a triple negative – two negative’s makes a truth – the third negative rejects the truth. The third negative is the rebellion point that it goes against all that the worldly have taught you to this point in time. For if it is indeed truth then you’ve been beguiled by loved ones – trust figures and worse you allowed it to happen – thus the anger and rejection.
 
Thus one can see and understand the confusion and contention which exist by those who’ve had years to implant rhetorical thoughts in place of truthful thoughts. In doing so they’ve iced the landscape so it is easy for all to fall down and not want to get back up. To bring everyone to being average – the worst of the best and the best of the worst. Without any permanent reality we’re left as was Basil trying to comfort his best friends at the loss of a child – that there was no hope for the child! For in the creeds, doctrines, teachings of religion with one sole exception not only is there no physical body after death but those who die without some sort of baptism there is no hope of anything after death except outer darkness or what most call hell.
 
Many churches teach a double doctrine – one which pacifies their members and then always returning to their creeds or doctrines. One can say to a member – you want to be married for all time and eternity then that’s what I’ll say in performing the wedding ceremony. While in their state issued license they’ve no authority and from their various denomination they’ve no authority. However, their followers unless they’ve asked the merit questions have only confidence in what the clergy tell them.
 
Mohamed was the closest to a better understanding of the Doctrine of Jesus Christ – during the centuries of 100AD to 1830AD but this was all lost at his death.  What was left behind by Mohamed was a governmental power – loosely called a religion without keys or authority. It wasn’t until almost two hundred years after his death that the Qur’an was organized into a written document – and declared the only copy with anything else being burnt.
 
None of the major religious leaders from the 2nd Century on had the fullness of the Gospel left to teach. What remained were various Bishops of whom none had general authority to act in the name of the Church as organized by the Savior. The Apostasy had occurred! Any claims to the keys from the time of Peter were long disputed and unproved until given new life after the 17th Century.  However, all of the documents and historical writings show conclusively that there was no one bishop with absolute authority.
 
(Note: for those who want to learn more on this subject they might review the various lessons of four of the leading bishops of the time – who argued – wrote back and forth – advised and had to vote on anything of importance which led to the 1st Council of Nicea.  Remembering there had been multiple councils beginning with the earliest in 155AC of the bishops with no Apostles still alive. The Council of Jerusalem (c.50AD) was held and notes kept while most of the Apostles were still alive and where some had been murdered others put in their stead.) 
 
In the title of this short essay we find the three most important reasons for men/women to go astray; unwillingness, unbelieving and unrighteousness. Too many too often make the choices on their own to be rejected by the Father and the Son – only after they’ve rejected them – or their servants the Prophets. 
 
(Note: for those not familiar with the Book of Isaiah it is highly recommended that one read, study and ponder all of Isaiah – this was given as a commandment by the Savior to those he taught outside of Jerusalem when he told the Apostles he had other sheep to feed. If one doesn’t feel the need to do this, at least read Chapter 65 of Isaiah. “Ancient Israel was rejected for rejecting the Lord—The Lord’s people will rejoice and triumph during the Millennium.”)
 
The rejection of those of the House of Israel is not unlike the rejection found today. To reject means not to be found obedient to all of the teachings involved in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. One can still be a good person – even a very good person – but if they are unwilling and unbelieving of the teachings literally of the Scriptures and the Prophets and Apostles – then they’ve made the choice to surrender any attention of the Father and the Son. The Scriptures repeat this over and over – until one cannot deny they’ve been taught this principle of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
 
It is accepted and understood anyone acting in unrighteousness have forfeited their rights to the companionship of the Father and/or the Son – and indeed the Holy Ghost for those who’ve received this gift by one having authority to bestow it upon another. (Note: no one with a state license of within the creeds has this authority.) The Father and the Son have repeatedly stated that they can tolerate no semblance of sin. Thus one can see those who act in unrighteousness have rejected the teachings and the Father and the Son.
 
Looking first then at what are people unwilling to do? Most are unwilling to change – they’d rather stay comfortable and unmoving than to change. Change requires one to become uncomfortable by doing something either new or changing the way they once did something. This is shown over and over again by those who are willing to stay in an abusive situation because at least they know what they have presently. It is the unknown future that scares them more than the abuse. Many of the world’s finest athletes are afraid to change what got them to where they are – thinking to change now might take it all away from them.
 
However, to learn and understand what one reads, studies and ponders most often requires a change to their individual thinking. A change in thinking or the way one looks at something requires a change of attitude. One must be willing to be responsible for their motivation which is always internal and long lasting.
 
Most have been conditioned since childhood with fear and incentive motivation – both of which are external and short lived. With the fear the source of fear must be present or very close by one. Whereas incentives must continue to get bigger/more and are always from someone else who wants you to give something to them. Or indeed do something for them. Thus each requires outside intervention which most likely will contradict what ones reads, studies or ponders.
 
When one takes a course in school there’s the old saying, “Garbage in – garbage out!” It doesn’t matter is what is taught is right – partially right – wrong or completely wrong! If a student wants a good grade they’ve to repeat what the instructor taught them mostly word for word. One of the reasons they spend so much time on math is to condition students (human beings) there is only one correct answer and that was taught to them by an instructor. Schools have no special interest in putting loose ‘free thinkers’ who are trained to ask questions of merit.
 
Therefore seldom is ones attitude considered in the educational process. Only for the good of the desires of those paying the wages of the instructors is important. From early on in the US this was the whole idea behind the Dewey System – humanism. The educational system was to train as many as possible with the least required skills – to do the minimal wage jobs effectively. The second desire was the break-up of the family unit. In fact it was a large social babysitting center to keep young people under their collective control until the age of sixteen.
 
While taking the young people out of the work force – their ultraistic reason – meant that someone else had to enter the workplace – for families to keep from starving. The educational system of the schools where no parental interference was tolerated was bland and unappealing except for those of the privileged classes.  It remains so today. Every now and then an exceptional student cannot be held down or otherwise destroyed. This is the exception and not the rule! While those with wealth and power gain special privilege will their children be given special educational opportunities.
 
Father’s had to start working two and three jobs – and mothers had to leave the home to help support the family. (Note: we’re talking more of the urban areas of the nation in the early years – but now this destruction of the family is gaining a foothold in rural America. This is done through the advertising, music, tv, movies and magazines.)  Today those seeking further educations on their own are finding themselves further in debt and struggling while our social programs pay special privilege to various groups who will play the party line and dance to their tunes.
 
Next we’ll look at the understanding of being unbelieving of truth. Using the guise of racism, fiction, guile, and social class distinctions we find that so much being presented as fact is actually misrepresentation of a deliberate nature.
 
There are many examples of this but here I’m only going to deal with two. Both involve religion and while one deals with both men and women the other only involves women. Both involve the same Church – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Church).  One involves the those who were not given the Priesthood and both involve the Temple.
For years the professional intellects attacked the Church over and over for allowing the Blacks to have the Priesthood or to be able to go to the Temple. In addition, they also attacked the Church for not allowing women to go by themselves to the Temple.
 
We can discuss these both simultaneously. Basically it is the world crying discrimination about something they knew very little about. For one to understand that very few men or women hold the priesthood or have Temple recommends and will never have that opportunity to ever hold either. When the Savior organized His Church upon the earth in any of its seven dispensations there were very few who held the Priesthood or were able to go to the Temple. For most of the dispensation of the Savior there was no Temple (the one at Jerusalem) was compromised) and there were none others. Then in most churches even found today most members hold no Priesthood and none have a Temple to which to attend.
 
So why was there a hue and cry against the Church? Why the big issue of racism? Or even that of equal rights? And if these were indeed problems why did Blacks and single women join the Church? Or those women who were married by their spouse who was unworthy to go to the Temple stay in the Church? Of course these questions were never asked – only the accusing finger of racism and of discrimination was always presented. Wouldn’t one find it interesting that those within the Church didn’t seem overly aroused by these accusations? Yet none bothered to ask – unless the person was an apostate from the Church. This is always a good out – find someone who has left an organization to get all of the local dirt.
 
Let’s consider the fact that only very few members in any of the dispensations of the Saviors true Church being upon the earth since Adam to today ever had access to a Temple or the Priesthood. Secondly that having the Priesthood is not a requirement to earn eternal life – worthiness is the only requirement after first baptism (by one having authority – see the example of the Savior) and then confirmation and receiving of the gift of the Holy Ghost (by one having authority – see Paul and other of the Apostles in the New Testament).  Thus the only requirements to earn eternal life (the ability to return to the Father and the Son with a physical body of flesh and bone and with our family and loved ones are; baptism, confirmation, gift of the Holy Ghost (each done by proper authority) and then to remain worthy.
 
Therefore this would be the place for those who’ve been so outwardly critical of the Church to have started. (Note: having been a member of the Church for almost 40 years – having the Priesthood has been doing a lot of work (smile) – while with certain exceptions could and was done by those not holding the Priesthood. No one in the Church seeks out a calling of leadership – (some do but learn to regret it and often times end up either inactive or apostatizing from the Church). Leadership places tremendous pressures on the individual and their families.
 
Thus those unwilling to believe the truth – seek not to learn the truth and thus seldom ask questions of merit – such as what was lost by not having either the Priesthood or a Temple Recommend. In addition, if so many indeed refuse to believe the revelations received – the additional Scriptures translated – then why are they so concerned. Could it be the minions of Satan have gotten them worked up and disturbed? Remember when Joseph Smith, Jr. was murdered it was those in the clergy throughout the US who praised the mobs and damned the remaining members of the Church!
 
Finally we’ll discuss very briefly the unrighteous. Basically, if God will not tolerate the least amount of sin – then those who are found unrighteous have no claim on anything from the Lord – let alone to blame him for anything worldly. The unrighteous commit the crimes of hate, murder, mass slaughter, sorrow, grief, robbery, cheating, stealing or the violations of many if not most of the Commandments, Laws or Statutes of Heavenly Father and His Son. Yes we find above the big ones – but how many spread rumors – murmur – lie a little – cheat a little – steal a little? Over 70% of High School and College students admit to cheating and how many engage in sex outside of marriage? How many show up at the sporting events or other events on the Sabbath Day?
 
Casting no pointing fingers for we’ve each choices to make and to be accountable and responsible for – and we all being humans in mortal probations have bad days – but how many willingly seek to repent and return to Heavenly Father? How many feel they’ve done wrong?
 
We’ve each to seek to learn the questions of merit – and to stick with it until we find the truthful answers of common sense which support the Scriptures literally. If we don’t – that is okay as well as we’ve each the agency to choose as we do. As Paul has explained the various degrees of glory which await all born into this mortality on this earth – all of these various kingdoms will be inherited! Those reading this have the ability to read, study and ponder. Understand those who cannot read this – will never hear of Jesus Christ in their mortal probation will also have the opportunity to hear, study and ponder in the millennium. For all who’ve lived on this earth will hear the fullness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. There will be found no excuses – see Matthew.
 
The initial question was asked: “What causes the Lord to withhold blessings from each of His children?” The answer is simple: men and women reject Him! They do this by being unwilling, unbelieving and unrighteous. The adversary knows this and encourages all three to be used by those in their earthly mortal probations. Ancient Israel was rejected for rejecting the Lord—The Lord’s people will rejoice and triumph during the Millennium. Will this not also apply to us?
 
Can we understand and appreciate the needfulness of asking merit questions?  It is my hope that we can each strive to continue asking questions of merit until we get the truthful common sense answer which is in full agreement with the Scriptures. c/ork
 
“If We Reject the Lord –
He’ll Reject Us!”
(Isaiah 65)
 
cji
1/7/13
 
When we’re found unwilling to obey
or unwilling to strive to understand
or unwilling to seek the literal truth
or found in unbelief of all that is true
or in unbelief of what we know is true
or in unbelief of common sense known
or acting in unrighteousness in life
being unrighteous in our behaviors
following not the Commandments all
we’ll be found in rejecting the Lord
then as those in the past discerned
in our rejection of Him will he reject us
for we’ve made the choice for both!
 
Copyright © 2012 – cji

No comments: