"Thoughts to Simplify" (Evolution - Creation -
Gospel of Jesus Christ) cji 10/26/12
Thoughts - hmmm.... it would seem that someone is mixing
grapefruit with chocolate! First, some
3400 books of Scripture are missing; second - every word in the Old and New
Testament were translated several times and by those who had a political agenda
after 70AD; and third - man's logismoi will never equal a Prophet's gnosis or
the Father or the Son or a Seer - in translation or wisdom. Over the millennium of time since the first
written words, symbols and records (which started with Adam and the Book of
Life - which no one has a current copy) only a very few scholars have ever
lived who could translate the actual texts of the oldest living documents
(mostly on stone or plates). Even the
in-fighting over the Dead Sea Scrolls has accomplished little as no one reads
them.
The division between those scholars who can read and
write and the audiences they service is great and to the point that most just
take the word of those doing the reading, i.e. Bible study groups - the pastor,
minister, priest, cleric, rabbi and whoever tell you what it says and what it means. The creeds of men/women are basically
philosophical logismoi which no one really claims to believe or if they do
understand - and if they say they believe and understand in reality they are
denying what the Scriptures say per
se'. When anyone uses big words - makes
it complicated - they are talking down to anyone who is trying to understand
what they are saying. Even sometimes I'm
not sure using the word 'logismoi' or 'gnosis' is a good idea. Paul used these words - but again most have
never read Paul completely and very little of what he wrote has been preserved
over the time since he lived. Peter
alluded to both of these - but even Peter while alive questioned what people
would say he said or wrote while alive - when those who were there with him -
taught what he had said as being different from what he'd said.
When anyone comes forward to instruct another in the
Scriptures and they are not being clear, concise and totally understandable,
then be forewarned that they've some type of agenda. There is so much known
that the intelligent orators of our world then and now - choose to deliberately
to overlook or shade gray or purple haze - that one is better off studying and
reading the Scriptures on their own. (note:
this writer suggests a Bible prior to the 1870's - as the age of revisionists
began in earnest after 1880 and has blossomed into some 50,000+ revisionists
Bibles. The most correct was around
1759 KJV - as this was almost entirely the efforts of William Tyndale (at least
80% of it). As an example one knows that
Isaiah and others taught about the coming of the Savior - who he was - and much
about him - but this was removed from the Scriptures - the usage of the name of
Jehovah and our Heavenly Father's name were removed - and Lord and LORD were
used in their place (while some churches today refuse to accept or understand
this and therefore change or remove even the watered down Scriptures we have
today.
One must remember - that the Scriptures (especially the
New Testament) is not in chronological order.
And much of the Old Testament (as the New) is missing or only partially
preserved. Would usages and punctuation
are sometimes wrong and thus give a different meaning than what was
intended. And things then when the
Prophets lived and recorded their teachings which were taken for granted
(therefore not explained) have changed.
Most seldom refer to primary source material in writing or research -
and thus certainly not when teaching the product of their writing or
research. Churches and those with a
vested interest (anyone who makes their living off of religion - priests, nuns,
rabbi's, ministers, clergy, clerics, pastors, deacons, and so on and so forth)
need to continue the 'big lie' or 'lack of information' or 'mis-information' or
'mysteries' or 'hidden meanings' do this so as to keep employed. Actually most are dependent upon how many
show up at their meetings to make a living - so they teach what the biggest
donators of their congregations want taught.
It would be beyond belief one could read the Bible literally and not
understand it on their own. It is
simple, clear, concise and to the point.
The Son says he is doing the Will of his Father - it should be read -
the Son is doing the Will of his Father!
Who needs and explanation of what this means? Yet almost every creed and teaching is that
there is no Son or Father - but they are one - without body, passions or
anything else.
Now to the idea of the article which seems to be
forthcoming from many - creation or evolution?
Creation was so taken for granted by the early followers of the Savior
and His Father that most felt no need to continually repeat - rather they just
referred to it. The same can be
understood with the Flood or the Parting of the Sea (waters). Darwin admitted in his own writings he could
never prove his theory - but yet men/women chose to believe it to be fact
without proof. Today they teach it as
fact while it is still yet to be proved.
So what is that makes this such an issue? It is the selfishness of men/women who feel
there is no need of God - or a creative force - taught by the churches of today
- Creatio-ex-nihilo - or creation out of nothing. Any five year old knows that to have
something tangible you have to make it out of something tangible. Evolution - which by the way does take place
- in the idea of decay and growth and decay and growth - but one cannot plant
an apple seed and get a pear tree. One
gets what they plant - nothing more or less - until they graft in something
else. The animals (dinosaurs) had to
live and die - and thus we've resources in the earth today to be used for other
purposes - how many years (millions or billions) who knows - there are some
excellent studies which by the saline content in the seas which can give a clue
to this - but to the average person it matters only that they lived and died
and we get gasoline to run our vehicles.
There is much most will never understand while in
mortality - why - because they've not prepared themselves to learn and discern
on their own. Many who've lived on this
planet earth never learned to read or write - some (most) have never lived
outside of a very contained environment - even today this is true - and until
the last 100 years - there was no TV, Radio, Movies, Internets, and mass
communications available to anyone.
Therefore what went on in one part of the world was unknown in someplace
else. Thus, one could say those in
Europe living in mud huts and other forms of housing were unaware of those
living in Middle America in Stone or other living accommodations. Those who used irrigation in the various
jungles of South America were most likely unaware that others didn't know about
this utilization. Was it evolution which
took us from walking to riding? Or
better - wearing coverings for our nakedness to wearing the latest
fashions? For those starving or barely
surviving in 3rd world nations - one would guess this is not a very important
subject for them. Yet, even a starving
person can see and recognize another that is not - and wonder why? They don't know about the millions or
billions in aid given to their nation’s leaders - but the leaders do - and
therefore the accountability will someday be measured. For evolutionists this will never happen -
the end is the end - but for those who know of the Father and the Son - they
know, and while helpless to do anything at this time - they know that both
justice and mercy will be meted out at the judgment bar. Most churches teach if you're not baptized in
this life you are damned - which makes little common sense - but wreaks of
final judgment on the part of those who teach such false doctrine. Some teach love or hate or both at the same
time - but understand not James 1:27.
Yet they all want to discuss their favorite doctrines mixed with
philosophy and men's/women's wisdom.
Let’s get back to the original article of discussion of
evolution and creation. Evolution taught
in the format of Darwin - is meaningless - a theory unproven and with little
common sense or simplicity. Those who
teach creation without knowledge of the Father and the Son - and the pure
simplicity of the Scriptures are in the same boat of confusion and
contention. It would appear that neither
teaches absolute obedience to the Ten Commandments (and other Commandment,
Statutes and Laws of the Father and the Son) but only what they chose to
empathize. You cannot teach just one or
the other - however, to teach about either one has to understand the purpose of
this life and what it means for 'life eternal' or 'salvation' - instead of just
being 'saved' or returning to nothing.
Everyone born into mortality is 'saved' this was through the Atonement
of the Savior for our transgressions.
However, not everyone will enter into 'eternal life' to live once more
with the Father and the Son and their individual families with bodies of skin
and bone. (Read the Scriptures it is all there in print - clear, concise and
simple to understand.) Evolutionists
believe one lives and dies - many churches teach 'dust to dust' or 'nothing to
nothing' (read their creeds) and that at most one returns to being a spirit
without body or parts. Yet this isn't
the way that the Savior was described after His resurrection or when Paul,
Stephen or others saw him - yet man/woman needs to feel that there is no more
need for the Father and the Son - as they've all they need. Thus in some sort of strange play most
churches teach what the evolutionists teach - nothing to nothing - having
somehow evolved only to die without anything hereafter. And vice-versa - the evolutionists teach what
the churches teach - nothing to nothing - as they certainly don't teach what we
will evolve into - as they've tied their kite strings to the idea of the
survival of the fittest (Spencer) and therefore eventually something or someone
will devour everything else.
Mostly those who argue evolution or creation do so for a
profit or justification for dominion over another. One is wealthier or stronger - or whatever
than other to rule over those who are not so blessed. One can be a hedonist and do whatever they
want - either in or out of religion/evolution - without any consequences - for
one it doesn't matter and for the other there's death bed confession. One has choices to make in this mortal
probation - either to choose well or to choose 'not good'. Obedience as described as to only choose
well! "If you love me, keep my
Commandments," leaves no wiggle room - none! Again, read the Scriptures! There is true repentance - but one cannot sin
with the understanding they'll repent later.
One can sin without a true knowledge of the law - and therefore when
taught the true knowledge - they can truly repent and go and sin no more. Too many make excuses and justifications for
the sake of discussion - argument - or whatever - but one must remember the
rule giver didn't allow for man-made excuses or justifications for one who
knows the rules, laws, statutes and commandments.
Thus the usage of creation - evolution or trying to tell
another of what something means in the Scriptures is not a teaching of the
Scriptures. Agency - choice - good/evil
- Zion/Babylon - and the mission and Gospel of Jesus Christ are taught in the
Scriptures so all can understand them clearly, concisely and simply. Each individual is accountable and responsible
for what they know and what they should've known! Only those without the law
can be held unaccountable or responsible.
i.e. little children before the age of eight - those who've not been
raised and taught the law - those born with mental illnesses - those with
physical handicaps which preclude being able to learn and function - those
living at a time or place where the law is unknown - and possibly other
circumstances which this writer is unaware.
Where did we come from - why are we here - where might we
be going when we leave here - this is what the Scriptures teach each of us - if
we but read - ponder - pray and ask Father in the name of the Son - (James 1:5)
- with a pure heart and intent. Nothing
is complicated in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Ask yourself this question - if you're a loving Father or Mother - would
you want to trick, lie, beguile, or otherwise mislead your children? Why then would Heavenly Father want to do
this to us? He doesn't - he loves us -
and if we love him - we'll keep his Commandments! We must each ponder, pray, study it out in
our minds, and seek wisdom from Heavenly Father - this is the Gospel of Jesus
Christ - and not the logismoi of men or women.
"Thoughts to
Simplify"
cji
10/26/12
Catching a fair
wind today
sailing in ease
and comfort
watching the
horizon well
checking the chop
of the sea
having checked a
barometer
the set of the
sails are full
our course to Zion
sure
thoughts to
simplify each
where did I come
from
why am I really here
where might I be
going
in surety of the
eternal
I came from Father
above
I am here to prove
worthy
someday to live
again
with the Father
and Son
with my family
forever
these found with
me
thoughts ever so
simple!
Copyright © 2012 –
cji
No comments:
Post a Comment